About Jesus     Steve Sweetman

Home Page     

This Section - Chapters 1 to 2:3

Next Section - Chapters 2

ch. 1:1-2     ch.1:3-13     ch. 1:13-2:3

My Commentary on the First Letter Of  Peter

 

Introduction

 

This commentary is based on the 1994 edition of the NIV Bible.  The section titles in this commentary correspond to those found in the NIV Bible.   

 

The 2 letters of Peter were written by Simon Peter, one of the disciples of Jesus.  Jesus also called him Cephus, Aramaic for “stone, or rock”.  Most of what we know about Peter is found in the 4 Gospels, the first 13 chapters of Acts, and a little from what Paul says about him.

 

We know very little about Peter’s missionary trips. In Acts 12:17, after his miraculous escape from prison Luke says that he went “to other places”.  We simply don’t know where these other places were.  Tradition has it that he ended up in Rome , sometime after Paul came to Rome .  Tradition also has it that he was executed in Rome on a cross.  Some tradition states that he was hung upside down in order not to be killed in the same way Jesus was killed.  Catholics believe that his tomb is under St. Peter’s Basilica, thus the reason for the church building’s name

 

Peter was an “unlearned and ignorant” fisherman (Acts 4:13).  This has presented problems with some concerning the authorship of first and second Peter.  Some suggest that Peter was not intelligent enough to write such a letter in Greek.  But we don’t need to worry about this because Peter himself says that Silas helped him write this letter.  This Silas was the Silas who was friends with Paul and Timothy.  Silas knew Greek.

 

It appears from chapter 5 verse 13 that Peter wrote this letter from someplace in Babylon to the Christians on the northern shore of the Mediterranean and as far north as the Black Sea .

 

Peter says that he wrote this letter from Babylon . There is a discrepancy between scholars whether the Babylon mentioned in chapter 5 verse 13 is the actual area, which is now Iraq , where Babylon has been associated with over the centuries.  Many suggest that Peter might have been using the word Babylon symbolically of Rome .  The idea is that he did not want to say anything that would be taken offensively by the Romans, which might get him in trouble.

 

No one knows for certain just when Peter wrote his first letter.  Many suggest that it might be around 63 AD.  The reason given for this is because of the reference in chapter 1 verse 1 to those who have been “scattered”.  James, the writer of James, and one, if not the main leader in Jerusalem , was killed for his faith in 62 AD.  This was the beginning of even greater persecution of Christians, not only by Jews but also by Romans.  This persecution caused yet another round of Christian Jews being driven out of Jerusalem and Judea .  This might be the reference that Peter is speaking about when he uses the word “scattered”.  Thus the date of  63 AD.

 

Peter’s Introduction (ch. 1:1 - 2)

 

Peter begins his letter by introducing himself as an apostle, or “apostolos” in Greek, meaning “one who is sent”.  In Acts 1:22 we note that Peter believed that the apostle to take Judas’ place had to be one that had been with Jesus from the beginning.   Yet does this mean that only men who lived on earth and saw Jesus in the flesh can be an apostle.  Not really.  There are other apostles mentioned in the New Testament, including Silas, Timothy, and Paul, among others.  Paul himself speaks of his apostleship in as being one who was born late, that is, compared to the other main apostles such as Peter.      

 

Peter believed that the one who took the place of Judas, one of the 12, had to have been with them from the beginning.  The 12 were specifically appointed by Jesus and thus were somewhat special, that is why Judas’ replacement had to have known Jesus in the flesh, at least this was Peter’s thinking.

 

Concerning modern day apostles, I believe that we need to make a distinction between them and the original 12 plus Paul.  A modern day apostle cannot proclaim special revelation that does not agree with the Bible.  In fact modern day apostles only repeat what the Biblical apostles have taught.  Apostles of today teach what the first apostles taught.

 

This presents the question, “are apostles really for today”?  Some say yes to this question, while others say no.  But the fact of the matter is, if there were secondary apostles after the 12, and if an apostle is simply one who is sent, then it is logical to conclude that people can be apostles today.

 

In my personal experience with so-called modern day apostles, some who claim such status are not always ones who have been sent out.  They are more of a pastor or an administrator.  A person who is always in one location, and never sent out, does not fit the definition of an apostle.

 

Peter addresses his letter to the “elect”.  Over  the centuries, and  especially since the Reformation this word has caused great discussion.  Without getting into the controversy of predestination (see my notes for Rom. 8:28-30 to explain predestination), “elect” simply means God’s chosen people.  Peter most likely uses this term in its Jewish sense.  Being a Jew he understood that Israel was God’s “elect people”, or “chosen people”.  This might suggest a predestined choice on God’s part, yet in fact He has chosen all mankind to be His people.  Yet only those who receive this salvation are included in God’s elect people.

 

Is Peter thinking only of Jewish Christians here when he speaks of God’s elect?  I don’t know for sure.  Some may suggest since he uses the word “scattered”, as in scattered throughout Asia, Bithynia , Galatia , and Capadocia, he is referring to Jewish Christians who have been scattered because of Christian persecution in and around Jerusalem .  That might well be so, but he might be speaking about Christians in general, since in one sense of the word, Gentile Christians are God's elect as well.  Yet that being said, Peter might well be thinking of Jewish Christians.  I'd suggest that for the most part in the New Testament, but not all the time, the word "elect" refers to Jews.  

 

Peter says that these Christians have been chosen because “of the foreknowledge of God”.  Thus we see part of the doctrine of predestination, or at least my version of this doctrine.  Simply put, God, in His ultimate foreknowledge of all things, that is, He knows what will happen before it happens, He knows who will be saved.  He does not make salvation happen to people, He only knows ahead of time who will receive salvation, and who will reject salvation.  God knows these things because I don't believe God is in our space and time domain.  He is outside of space and time, or at least our type of space and time, and what is in the future for us is in the eternal present for God.

 

There is a lot of theology in this second  verse, especially from and “unlearned man”.  Peter has just spoken about 2 great theological concepts; election, and foreknowledge.  Now in the next phrase he says, “through the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit”.  Here, yet another theological concept is introduced, and that is “sanctification”.  This word simply means “to separate”.  In this context the work of the Holy Spirit is to “separate” God’s people from the world, solely unto God.  That is to say, that the world no longer owns the Christian, but God Himself is the owner of the Christian.  The Holy Spirit separates the true believer from the unbelievers in the world, and places them into the people of God.

 

Why does the Holy Spirit do this sanctifying?  Peter says, “for the obedience to Jesus Christ”.  Believers are expected to obey Jesus after they give their lives to Him.  That sounds only natural, although by experience we can see that this is not always the case with people.  Thus one might conclude that if there is not evidence of such obedience to Jesus, then one has not been separated from the world, one has not really been saved. 

 

Sanctification might be seen in 2 parts.  It is a one time event when one gives his life to Jesus, yet on the other hand it is a progressive thing.  One is in the process of being separated from the world as he gives more of his life to Jesus.  What sanctification isn’t, at least in my thinking, is a one time second experience as the Methodists would teach, something like the second work of grace called the baptism in the Spirit as Pentecostals would teach.  This doctrine of sanctification says that at some subsequent point to one’s conversion, one gets “totally sanctified”, that is to say, the world has absolutely no hold on the person.  I don’t really believe this can happen in one experience.

 

When one gets saved, one is transplanted from one kingdom to another, then after this transplant takes place there is a process in which the earthly kingdom little by little is taken out of the person.   You might put it this way.  God separates us out of the world at conversion and puts us in His kingdom.  Then once that has taken place He, by His Spirit takes the earthly kingdom out of us.

 

Peter closes this verse with the phrase, “for the obedience of Jesus Christ and the sprinkling of His blood”.  The words “sprinkling of blood” is a direct reference to Jewish custom as detailed in the Law of Moses. In using the word “obedience” which the Jewish Christians would have been raised to understand, this obedience would be to the Law of Moses.  Now obedience is replaced to obedience to Jesus.  This is the New Covenant which is not based on the Law, not based on blood sacrifices, but based on the blood sacrifice of Jesus.  So by using the words obedience to Jesus, and his blood, the reader knows well what Peter is speaking about.  This is not a matter of the Law, but a matter of Jesus and His shed blood. 

 

Getting back to the beginning of this verse when Peter calls Christians “elect strangers in the world”.  The Larry Norman song from the 1970’s is good commentary on this verse.  In one of his songs he says, “this world is not my home, I’m just passing through”.   Although God created the world, the world in its present condition is not what God created.  We as Christians are thus foreigners, or strangers in the world in its present state.  Our home is in heaven with Jesus.  So Larry Norman is right when he says that he is just “passing through”.  This thought may not sit well with some “kingdom now” teachers who have little thought about Heaven.  But the truth of the matter is that the first generation Christian, like Peter, did not put much hope in this present world. Their hope was always in the resurrection  life to come.

 

The next phrase ends Peter’s greeting.  It says, “grace and peace be with you in abundance”.  This is a prayer.  Peter is praying that God’s grace and His peace will be with these people in the midst of all their trials and tribulations, of which there are many.  The natural tendency for these people, and for us today, is to give up in times of hardship.  Peter wanted God’s grace, meaning, His ability to get us through our troubles, to be strong in these people’s lives. Then beyond that, he wanted the peace that only comes from our Lord to be with these people in these hard times. 

 

Simply put, Peter says, “may God grant you His ability to stand firm in trouble, and His peace that will help you cope”.

 

Praise To God For Living Hope  (ch. 1:3 - 12)

 

Verse 3 begins with these words, “praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”.  We have seen this phrase many times in Paul’s writings.  Did Peter get this thought from Paul?  We don’t know for sure.  But it is a good guess that the truth behind these words was a main component of these early Christians thinking.  The point to be made is this.  The God that Peter claims to give praise to is both God, and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Peter does not believe in a generic God.  The New Testament does not teach a generic God.  The God that Peter gives praise to, and us too, is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  This God is different than any other proclaimed God in human history.

 

When Peter uses the term "God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ", as a Jew, this is very significant.  Jews believed in Yahweh, the God and father of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.  Now Peter is adding Jesus to this list and when doing so is thinking of Jesus as actually being God in human flesh.  This would be very disturbing to non-Christian Jews.    

 

We also note that Peter calls Jesus “our Lord Jesus Christ”.  The word “our’ is possessive, meaning, Jesus belongs to us as Christians.  Even more so, Jesus has been given to us.  (for unto us a child is born…”  Isa. 9:6)  We also note His name Jesus that was given to Him at His human birth is followed by 2 titles.  He is both Lord, (King of all there is), and Saviour (the only one who can bring salvation to us). 

 

As you study the N. T. you will find certain truths that the early Christians promoted.  At times I feel that we do not promote these truths to the extent that they did, but promote secondary issues instead.  One of these truths are found here in verse 3.  Peter says that God has “given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus”.  Three points should be made here.  One is the idea of the new birth.  John 3 says this very clearly.  When giving our lives to Jesus, we are actually born again by the Holy Spirit.  When at initial salvation we receive God’s Spirit into our lives, this in fact causes us to be born twice.  We have already been born in a physical sense into this world, but at conversion, we are born again into a spiritual world.  This world is not understood by those who have not been born again. 

 

The second point is that we are born into a hope.  A study of other New Testament passages will tell us that the hope of the early Christian was for the return of Jesus that would usher in the life beyond, or the resurrection life.  This hope was futuristic.  For those who suggest that thinking, and hoping for Heaven is futile and a waist of time, they are wrong.  The early Christians thought much of their new life to come with Jesus in Heaven.  And why not.  Their existence on earth was full of hardship.

 

The third point is this.  Our resurrection is based on the resurrection of Jesus.  Peter, like Paul was very strong on this point. 1 Cor. 15 is the definitive chapter on this subject.  Paul simply says that if Jesus rose from the dead, so will we.  Peter believed the same, and you can see this when reading his messages in the first half of the book of Acts.  The resurrection, of both Jesus and the Christian was one of the most talked about and preached subjects by the early Christians.

 

Peter goes on to elaborate on the resurrection life.  He says in verse 4 “and into an inheritance that can never perish, spoil or fade – kept in Heaven for you…”  An inheritance is something that is given to someone after the owner of the things to be inherited passes away.  Jesus died and therefore has willed something to us.  We get this inheritance after we die, because it is not an earthly or material inheritance. God is keeping it safe for us.  Where?  It is in Heaven, where it cannot perish, spoil or fade.  Everything here on earth moves towards perishing, spoiling, and fading, but what God has planned for us in Heaven lasts in the state of perfection forever.  It is this hope that Peter expresses in this verse.  Peter is preaching the eternal kingdom to come.  Once again, in these last 40 years in different parts of the church, the “kingdom now’ theology, which has its place, has been over emphasized to the degree that it has excluded any reference to the future kingdom in Heaven.

 

In verse 5 Peter continues with this long sentence of his.  He says, “through faith (you) are shielded by God’s power until the coming of the salvation that is ready to be revealed in the last times”.  By saying “through faith we are shielded”. Peter is saying that because you trust in Jesus, He will look after you.  The word “shield” is of course a military word.  The early Christians viewed themselves in a fight against the world and the devil.  They needed a shield of protection.  Our trust in Jesus enables Him to protect us.

 

Peter says that we will be protected until the coming salvation.  Two points should be noted hear.  One point is that protection does not mean a happy and easy life.  Many of these early Christians were being killed when Peter was writing these words, so we cannot interpret Peter as saying everything will be nice and easy.  What then will be protected?  Our eternal souls will be protected along with our future inheritance. 

 

The second point to be made is that Peter speaks of salvation here in the future tense.  But you might say that salvation should be spoken of in the past tense, that is to say, that you are already saved.  That is true.  Yet salvation as seen in the New Testament has three aspects to it.  We were saved.  We are in the process of being save.  We will be saved.  Peter is speaking of this last aspect of salvation.  In the last times, when Jesus returns to earth, we will be completely saved.  Our salvation that has been in the process of being given to us will be completed on Resurrection Day.

 

In verse 6 Peter says, “in this you greatly rejoice”.  What is the word “this” that Peter is talking about.  “This” is referring to our future hope of salvation.  Peter is saying that we are greatly rejoicing over the fact that some day all our trials will be over and we will be in a state of perfection and in the presence of Jesus.  Peter is saying that both himself and his readers are rejoicing in this fact.

 

These people are definitely not rejoicing in their present circumstances.  The notion that Christians need to always be happy, even in hard times is not Biblical.  I say this because of the rest of Peter’s sentence.  It says, “though now for a little while you may have had to suffer grief in all kinds of trials”.  The words “little while” refers to the present life these people are living with all of its trials.  Our earthly  life in comparison to eternity is “a little while’.

 

Peter realizes that his readers are going through “all kinds of trials”, and as already mention, many trials led to their death. These were not happy days.  Yet in the midst of these hard times the early Christians did rejoice, not because of the hard times, but because of their thoughts of eternity.

 

Peter states his reason for the trials these people are going through.  Now if the trials these people are experiencing are associated with persecution due to their faith, obviously the number one reason for the trials is their faith.  Yet Peter gives another reason, and maybe in his mind it is the real reason.  The reason Peter gives is that the trials are a test of faith, so it “will be proven genuine”.  Peter in this instance sounds like James.  James speaks of false faith.  Here Peter speaks of “genuine faith”. 

 

Now if Peter has to use the words “genuine faith”, he must think that some people who claim faith don’t have genuine faith.  This is still true today.  Just because people claim to have faith in Jesus doesn’t necessarily mean that faith is real and genuine.   By definition faith is actually trusting in Jesus.  Faith is not some abstract concept.  It is a real concrete act of trusting, which indicates some type of relationship with Jesus.

 

Peter compares our trust in Jesus to gold.  Even though gold may have its importance, and it is refined by fire, it still perishes.  Yet real faith is more important than gold, and leads to eternal life that does not perish.  What Peter is suggesting to these people is that even though you have these trials, and even though you may be experiencing financial hardship as a result, your trust in Jesus is more important, and these trials will show if you really do trust Jesus.  If your faith is genuine, then these trials will only strengthen and deepen your trust in Jesus.

 

We need to note at this point that faith is not a commodity that you can get more of.   I often hear this phrase, “I need more faith”, as if faith is something that you can get more of, or something that comes down from Heaven and drops into our lives.  If faith is trusting in Jesus, then we can't get more of it.  We can only trust Jesus with more of our lives.  So our prayer should not be, “give me more faith”, but, “help me trust more”.  Then the way Jesus answers this prayer is not dropping faith into our lives, but as Peter says, He tests our faith for its genuineness, and if it is real, then at that point we learn to trust Jesus with more of our lives.  This is how faith grows and matures.

 

To conclude verse 7 Peter says that if our faith is real, then this will result in praise, glory and honour  to God when Jesus is revealed.  Jesus will be revealed once again when He returns to earth.  This is yet another mention of the future return of Jesus.

 

In verse 8 Peter acknowledges the fact that his readers “do not see” Jesus at the present time.  That is they don’t see Him with their physical eyes. Yet even though they don’t see Him, they love Him, and believe in Him.  We should know that when Peter, or any other New Testament writer uses the word “believe”, they are not talking about merely assenting to the fact of Jesus’ existence.  Believing as defined in New Testament terms is giving oneself to Jesus in a trusting relationship. 

 

Peter also says that even though these Christians don’t see Jesus in person as yet, they are filled with “inexpressible joy”.  Even though these people are going through major trials, and even though they can’t see Jesus, they still believe, they still love Jesus, and they are filled with joy.  They may not be bubbly and happy, but deep inside them there is a joy that comes from knowing Jesus. This joy is inexpressible, meaning that words, and maybe not even outward expression of any kind can properly convey this joy.  So real joy is not necessarily noticed by the casual observer. 

 

The word "inexpressible" is interesting to me.  So many times I've heard pastors encourage people to get happy in a Sunday morning meeting.  "Put a smile on your face", they'd say.  Or, "express the joy that is within you."  Well, here Peter says that this joy, this deep joy cannot be expressed.   

 

Verse 9 gives the reason why these people have this joy.  It is because they are “receiving the goal of their faith, the salvation of their souls”.  As I noted earlier.  There are 3 aspects to salvation; you were saved, you are being saved, and you will be saved.  Peter is now speaking about the second aspect of salvation here. These people are in the process of being saved, and they have great joy because of it.  I wonder how many Christians today have great joy because they are in the process of being saved. 

 

The point to be made about being saved is that it is not always an easy process. That's why we may not talk much about it.  We'd rather think in terms of having gotten saved and finally will be saved at the end of this age.  

 

What are we saved from?  The number one thing that we are saved from is the wrath of God.  Then besides that we are saved from many things.  We are saved from the result of our sin, which includes hell.  We are saved from the bad effects of a fallen world.  The list can go on.  But we need to realize that the number one thing that we are saved from is God Himself.

 

Peter speaks in long sentences or at least Silas writes in long sentences.   The next sentence is quite long.  He speaks of the Old Testament prophets.  He says that these holy men spoke of this grace that would come to his readers.  He says that these men “searched intently to find out the time and circumstances which the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing when they predicted the suffering of Christ” (ch. 1:11)  The Old Testament prophets prophesied about the Christ that would come and that He would suffer.  Jewish people had a hard time understanding the concept of a suffering Messiah, but Peter says that it was all foretold ahead of time. 

 

The prophets spoke of the sufferings of Christ but Peter also adds another phrase.  They also spoke of the “glories that would follow”.  These glories are God’s redeemed people in Heaven at the end of this age, once the plan of salvation is fully accomplished. (“after the suffering of his soul … my righteous servant will justify many” – Isa. 53:11)  So here Peter, along with the prophets of old, show both the suffering Jesus and the ruling Jesus. 

 

In verse 12 Peter also understood that these prophets realized that they weren’t really speaking to themselves, or their generation, but their words were really directed to the people of the first century to whom the gospel was being preached to.  Now the prophets themselves did not know it was these first century people their words were directed to, but they did know it was for a future generation. 

 

Peter adds that those who have preached this gospel have done so “by the Holy Spirit who has come from Heaven”.  The same Holy Spirit that motivated the prophets of the Old Testament to prophesy also inspired the New Testament apostles to preach the good news. 

 

Peter concludes this section by saying that “even angels long to look into these things”. This gives the picture that even angels in Heaven desire to search out the things pertaining to  the gospel, yet the fact of the matter is that salvation is for mankind.   

 

That being said, throughout the Bible you see angels helping God with things on earth.  You might remember the outcry that God heard because of the sin of Sodom .  I believe this outcry came from angels.  It certainly didn't come from the sinners of earth because they were enjoying their sin.  In those days, angels were in deep anguish with what was happening on earth, as  they probably are today.  Angels have a real part to play in working out the will of God, this is why they desire the things Peter is speaking of here.   

 

 

Be Holy (ch. 1:13 - 25)

 

Peter begins this section with the word “therefore”, and as it has often been said, “when you see the word ‘therefore’, see why its there for”.  So in the context of what Peter is about to say as a result of what he just said.  He just spoke about our great salvation we have that was prophesied about centuries earlier.

 

So because of the prophecies that have now come true in the time of the reader,  Peter encourages them to have “their minds prepared for action”.  I suppose he could have used the word heart, but he doesn’t.  He uses the word  “mind”.  Our minds are very  important as Christians, despite the notion of some today that our minds are secondary.  Getting ready for actions needs preparation of the mind.  I think many of us Christians don’t think in terms of “action”.  We think in terms of “being”, as in being a Christian, not doing the things of a Christian. Being is passive.  Doing is active.  The New Testament is all about doing, not just about being. 

 

Peter also says, to be “self-controlled”.  Charismatic Christians often speak of being “spirit controlled”, that is allowing the Holy Spirit to be in charge of your life.  There is nothing wrong with this.  But there is also nothing wrong with being self-controlled.  Being self-controlled means to get your life under control.  You do it, not the Lord or anyone else. Don’t let other things, or circumstances be in charge of your life. We have the ability to look at our lives and take charge of it in the proper fashion, and this is what Peter is telling his readers.

 

The next piece of advise is once again futuristic.  As I have said before, the Bible is full of future references and those who ignore these references are choosing to ignore large parts of Scripture.  Peter says “to set your hope fully on the grace to be given you when Jesus is revealed”.  Peter speaks of the return of Christ when he uses the words “being revealed”. He used these words earlier.  He is telling his readers to set their hope on this future event.  If we are to set our hope on the return of Jesus, when  more grace will be given, this surely suggests that we are to think about the future and the return of Jesus.

 

In verse 14 Peter tells his readers, and us, not to give into the evil desires we had when we were in ignorance.  Before we gave our lives to Jesus we were indeed ignorant of the things of God.  We gave into sinful desire.  We now should not give into these desires, whatever they may be.  Once again, Peter says, “you don’t give into these desires”.  As Christians we can’t say that this is the job of the Holy Spirit.  It is our job to turn from evil desires with the help of the Holy Spirit.

 

Peter uses the word “conform” when speaking of these evil desires.  “Conform” suggests a life style.  At times we may give into evil desires, but Peter says don’t conform to them, don’t pattern your life after them.  Don’t make a lifestyle out of them.

 

In verse 15 Peter simply says, “just as He who has called you is holy, so be holy in all you do”.  Notice that Peter says “be holy in all you do”, not simply “be holy”.  We are holy, as Paul would say, because of the blood of Jesus.  God sees us as holy, even though we are far from holy.  Peter puts the emphases on holiness in things we do, not who we are.  In reality we can never be holy, at least until Jesus returns for us. God only views us as holy.  But we can be holy in deeds, or things we do.  Things we do and who we are 2 very different concepts.

 

Why does Peter tell us to be holy in the things we do? He says, “because it is written in the Old Testament to be holy because I am holy”. (Lev. 11:44 - 45)  Once again, we need to understand the good news, and that is that God views us as holy, even though we are far from holy.  So in this sense of the word, we are fulfilling Scripture by having this understanding.  Yet beyond this, we need to do holy things, as much as lies within us. 

 

We see a number of things in verse 17.  We note that God will judge us according to what we do and He will do it impartially.  It is my thinking that the first matter of judgment on God’s part is what we have done with Jesus.  It is our trust in Him that will  get us into Heaven.  Our entrance into Heaven is not based on what we do.  Yet beyond that, we will be rewarded once in Heaven and this reward is based on things we do.  As Paul says, some of the things we do will be burned up with fire because they were done with false motives. (1 Cor. 3:10-16) Yet things done with proper motives will give us a reward.  This is what I believe Peter is speaking about here.

 

Peter then goes on to say to “live your lives as strangers in reverent fear”.  Peter viewed himself as a stranger in this world.  He was a stranger because his whole way of living was so different than the rest of the world’s that he felt out of place.  Christians are to be strangers in this world, but we are often not. 

 

Peter also says to live “out of reverent fear”.  There  should be a sense of fear when it comes to God.  In one sense we are so thankful to Him, yet in another sense we are afraid of Him.  This idea of being afraid of God should motivate us in doing good. Most of us really don’t live in reverent fear of God.  We take Him for granted, and don’t really worry about what He might think and feel concerning the things we do.

 

I don't think that Peter is thinking of just reverence here when he uses the term "reverent fear".  I think he is thinking of real fear, that is, being afraid.  This is the dichotomy  of our faith.  WE ARE AFRAID OF God, yet as we run from Him out of fear, we return to Him our of love.

 

In verse 18 Peter mentions once again the uncertainty of silver and gold, or money.  Peter obviously did not have a lot of money, and figures that it only runs out after a while anyway.  The reference to money though is not the focus of the sentence.  He tells his readers that our redemption was not paid for with gold and silver that perishes.  It was in fact purchased with the very blood of Jesus, God’s Son. 

 

The word “redemption”  has a Biblical meaning.  In secular life one redeems a coupon at a store.  It is the equivalent of money at a particular store.  Yet in Biblical terms redemption is the process by which Jesus paid for the penalty of our sin.  Simply put, Jesus paid the necessary price to release us from the punishment due us because of our sin.  The price that He paid was His life.

 

One point to be made here is that he did not pay this price to the devil as often is thought.  He paid the price to God His Father. The devil has no part nor parcel in the redemption process.

 

Peter says that Jesus “was a lamb without defect”.  This is in reference to the Old Testament sacrifices.  Throughout Old Testament history all of Israel sacrificed the best lamb to atone for their sin, but in this case, Jesus was the best of all lambs.  In fact He was a perfect lamb.  Jesus, the only perfect one, died as a sinner and criminal in our place.

 

Peter also says in this verse that “we were redeemed from our empty way of life handed down to us from our fathers”.  Two points are made here.  One is that Peter, like Paul, views life as being pretty empty without Jesus.  Peter uses the word empty.  I and others would use the word depraved.  As Paul clearly sets forth in Romans 1 and 2, our lives are all depraved, all empty, and all full of sin, falling way short of God’s glory.

 

The second  point is that this empty life has been handed down from our fathers.  This empty life is genetic.  We are born in this emptiness.  We don’t become empty after our first sin.  We are simply born this way.  This might have some significance for Jews.  They placed much stock in their fathers.  The God they served was the God of their fathers.  The traditions they kept were the traditions of their fathers, and now Peter is saying that their fathers have handed down an empty way of life for them.  

 

In verse 20 Peter says that Jesus was “chosen before the creation of the world”.   God in all his foreknowledge and wisdom knew that He would have to provide some means of  salvation to His creation, and that salvation would be through Jesus, His Son.  This tells us something.  It tells us that even as God was creating the earth and all therein, He knew what would soon happen.  He knew that man would not obey Him.  Adam and Eve's fall from grace was no surprise for God.  It might have actually been in His plan.

 

Even though God’s plan of salvation was thought of well before creation, it was instituted as Peter says, “in these last days”.  Here we see one of  two meanings of this term “last days” that is found in the New Testament.  Peter understood the last days to have begun at the birth of Jesus, when as he puts it, “He was revealed”, meaning at birth.  The other use of this term applies to the time that is right at the end of this age, right before the time when Jesus returns, or as Peter puts it, is “revealed” again.  Peter likes the word “revealed”.

 

In verse 21 Peter says that it is “through Him (Jesus) that you believe in God”.  This is especially important in our day when everyone believes in God and also believes that there are different paths leading to God.  This is not the thinking of the Bible.  Peter specifically says that we believe in God through Jesus.  God is the Father of Jesus, and it is this God that Christians believe in, give their lives to, and worship.

 

Peter goes on to say that God raised Jesus from the dead and glorified Him”.  What does it mean when Peter says that Jesus was glorified?  I believe the answer can be found in a careful reading of John 17.  This chapter is a prayer that Jesus prayed to His Father. It is the longest recorded prayer we have from Jesus’ lips.  In it He asks to be glorified with the glory He had with His Father before the world began.  What Jesus was asking for here was to be re-united with His Father in the oneness that they had before the incarnation, before He came to earth, and before the world was made.  We thus ask, when did Jesus get glorified?  Jesus was re-united with God the Father at His ascension.  Thus we see the resurrection and the ascension  spoken of by Peter.

 

One side note here.  It is my thinking that Jesus was not re-united in the exact same way that He was before He came to earth.  I believe that God the Father and Jesus the Son were completely one in essence, in nature, in being, however you might want to describe their being.  But when Jesus went back to Heaven He appears in Scripture as being distinct and separate from His Father.  To me this shows the love of our Lord Jesus Christ.  His eternal being, who He is has been eternally altered to bring salvation to us.

 

Peter ends this paragraph by saying that our faith, or trust in God is based on this very thing, that is the resurrection and the ascension

 

In verse 22 Peter says, “now that you have purified yourself by obeying the truth…”  Just what does he mean in light of the fact that salvation by faith in God’s grace and not by any works of purification that we can do?  The context of this verse is “believing” in Jesus, as seen in the last verse.  So what I believe Peter is saying is that these people have purified themselves by putting their trust in Jesus, and not in anything else.  When he adds the words “by obeying the truth”, the truth that he is speaking of is the truth of salvation through Jesus.  It is not obeying any rules, any laws, and especially not the Law of Moses.

 

So with this in mind Peter says that these people have love for their Christian brothers.  Peter must believe that if one has genuine faith in Jesus, a “sincere love” for the brothers should be evident.  Yet even though they have this love Peter encourages them to love the brothers even more.

 

Why should we have love for our brothers?  Verse 23 says, “because you have been born again”.  We have been born into a new kingdom, a new dimension of life, where Jesus lives.  Jesus has great love for his brothers, so we should as well.  A matter of fact Peter goes on to say that our new life is based on an “imperishable seed”.   The context of the word “seed” here applies to birth.  The seed of a woman that gives birth to a baby comes from a man.  The seed that gives us new birth comes from Jesus, and He is not perishable.  He lives for ever and so will we.  It is our connection with this “imperishable seed” that gives us the ability to love our brothers as we should.

 

Peter calls Jesus the “enduring word of God”, as does John in John 1:1.  The Word that spoke things into existence at creation is Jesus Himself.  Then as John puts it, “the Word became flesh and lived among us”. (John 1:14)  At this point who Jesus was changed forever.  It is my thinking that when Jesus returned back to Heaven, He did not return as the Word, but with a resurrected body, like we will have.  This is why I say that Jesus altered His existence for all of eternity, just for us.

 

Peter backs up what he is saying  by quoting Isa. 40:6 – 8.  He uses these verses as a comparison between man and Jesus.  He has just said that Jesus was imperishable, and now he tells us that man is like the grass of the field with its flower.  The grass withers and dies, and the flower falls off.  Man is perishable. The Word of God stands forever Peter says.

 

Peter then says, “this is the Word that was preached to you”.  Who preached this Word?   We know that Paul was in these parts preaching the Word, but this word could have also been preached by Peter Himself.  It is most probably that Peter spent time in the areas in which he is addressing this letter.

 

Because of this truth Peter has once again proclaimed to them, the truth of God’s eternal Word versus man’s mortality, Peter gives some specific commands.  He says, “rid yourself of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy and slander of every kind”.  (ch. 2:1)  If these Christians had to be warned of such things, then it is quite clear that they were being tempted to do these things, in not in fact doing them already.  It does not matter what generation of Christians you find yourself associated with, the tendency to fall back into sin is always present.  So Peter is reminding his readers about this.

 

Instead of involving yourself with such sin Peter tells his readers to “crave pure spiritual milk”.  What is spiritual milk?  It is pretty well accepted that when the New Testament  writers speak of spiritual milk, they are speaking of the Word of God”.  In Peter’s case that would be the Old Testament, and even parts of our New Testament that he would have access to.

 

Peter uses the adjectives, “spiritual and pure” when speaking of the Word of God.  God’s Word is both spiritual and pure.  Yet some adulterize the Word which makes it less pure.  We need the pure Word.

 

In verse 3 Peter says that it is through this milk “that you grow up in this salvation”.   This tells me that a person can be saved, can have salvation, but not grow up in the salvation they have.  Growing up means to become mature, which indicates living right with all understanding and wisdom.  So for many Christians today who have not put much emphases on the Bible, it is impossible for them to grow up into being mature Christians – and we wonder why we don’t see more of the power of the Spirit.

 

Peter ends this section by saying, “now that you have tasted that the Lord is good”.  To me the word “tasted” here suggests the beginning of things.  You first taste new food to see if you like it.  Once you like it, you do more than taste it.  You eat it.  Peter says that these people have tasted the Lord, that is in a spiritual sense, and He is very good.  Now that the taste test is over, delve into the things of the Lord and start to grow from the “sincere mile of the word”. (KJV)

 

 

Next Section - Chapters 2

 

Home Page