About Jesus  -  Steve Sweetman

Home Page

Previous Section - Chapter 18:15 - 18

Next Chapter - Chapter 18:19 - 25 - 27 

  

    The High Priest Questions Jesus (ch. 18:19-24)

 

While people were warming themselves by the fire, the high priest was questioning Jesus about His disciples and about His teaching.  It appears that even though Annas was not officially the high priest, John calls him the high priest here. We know that John is speaking of Annas because in verse 24 Annas sends Jesus over to Caiaphas, the official high priest at the time.

 

In verse 19 the high priest asked Jesus about His disciples and about what He taught.  I can understand why the high priest would question Jesus about His teaching.  The Jewish leadership had been doing that all along.  Just why the high priest questioned Jesus about His disciples is probably speculation.  Remember, they viewed Jesus as a revolutionary or a zealot.  A revolutionary leader with followers could be dangerous.

 

In verse 20 Jesus made it quite clear that what He taught was no secret.  He spoke openly in synagogues and at the temple.  The point here is that the high priest should have known what Jesus taught and therefore his question was unfounded.  So in verse 21 Jesus told the high priest to ask this question to those who heard Him teach.  They should know what He taught.  This shows us that Jesus was not afraid of the high priest.  He said whatever He wanted to say. Of course, this would have irritated the high priest as you might expect.  It was for this reason that one of the officials who stood near Jesus struck Him on the cheek.  

 

In verse 21 Jesus reverses things.  He was the one on trial here.  He was the one to whom the questions were being asked, but here He asks the question.  Jesus had the inner strength, the confidence, to turn the tables around and ask the questions.  It was as if He were putting the high priest on trial instead of Him being on trial.   

In verse 23 we now see Jesus turning the other cheek as He once taught His disciples.  He questions the official why he struck Him.  He said, "testify to what is wrong," meaning, "tell me in this legal setting why you think what I said is wrong."  He then said, "If I spoke the truth, why did you strike me?"  Jesus uses the words "testify" and "truth" here.  This is supposed to be a matter of legalities, but obviously honorable legalities were thrown out the window at this point.  Once again, Jesus is not afraid to speak up for Himself.  We will learn later that that while before Pilate Jesus was pretty much silent, but not here.  Although Jesus willingly went to the cross in obedience to His Father, you can see here that He was no door mat that the Jewish leadership could just walk over Him. 

It was Jesus who was speaking the truth and the truth supercedes questioning a leader.  Jesus realized to whom He was speaking.  He didn't need any official to tell Him that.  He also realized that the Law of Moses required respect for the high priest, but truth must come before respect.  Too often both secular and church leaders demand respect without wanting to be accountable to the truth.  If a leader is in the wrong, the wrong needs to be pointed out.  We are first loyal to the truth and then loyal to leadership.  This is what Jesus was getting at.

 

The high priest had no answer for Jesus.  He appears to have had enough and so he sent Jesus bound to Caiaphas, the official high priest, as we see in verse 24.

 

You might have noticed that both Annas and Caiaphas are called high priest.  There can only be one high priest and we know from earlier that Caiaphas was really the high priest.  Annas was a high priest, maybe just before Caiaphas became high priest.  It is like former presidents of the United States , even though they are no longer presidents, they are still called a president. 

 

Next Chapter - Chapter 18:19 - 25 - 27 

  

Previous Section - Chapter 18:15 - 18

Home Page