About Jesus     Steve Sweetman

www.stevesweetman.com

Home Page

My Journey Through The Ecclesiastical Maze

Part 30

 

Home Groups

 

Acts 17:24 tells us that God doesn’t live in buildings made by men.  We all know that, but I’m not convinced we all live what we know.  Knowing something and living out what we know are two different things.  I’m sure you will agree with me on that point.

 

You might conclude from all that I’ve said that I  believe “home groups” or “house churches” are the way to go and that’s what the New Testament teaches.  Well, that’s not exactly so.

 

I’ve had lots of experiences with “home groups” or “house churches” over the years.  The “House Church Movement” of the last forty years probably wouldn’t call a “home group” a “house church” since home groups are normally more casual and less organized.  Traditional churches use the term “home groups” when thinking in terms of their small groups that meet in homes instead of their church buildings.  Those in the “House Church Movement” view themselves as a full-fledged church, not just a little group meeting in a house.      

 

As you know, for the first twenty years of my life church was all about meeting in a building that was called a church but couldn’t be a church because a church isn’t a building.  When I grew of age in the Lord and left the comfort of that church, my friends and I, for the most part, met in homes in the beginning days. That was only to be expected since we had no other place to meet.

 

Further along the way we also gathered in parks, in school rooms,  in hotels and motels, in community and civic buildings, and wherever else that seemed convenient at the time. The place in which we gathered wasn’t important to us.  Getting together was the important thing because  Jesus had joined us together.  It’s like when you first fell in love.  You just wanted to be with the one you loved, and it didn’t really matter where that was.  A park bench might well have been one of your favourite meeting places.

 

Back in the early 1970’s while traveling on a train I sat beside an older man who I discovered was a Christian.  My heart was overjoyed that I’d met a brother in Jesus on the train.  When I went to shake his hand in an expression of joy, he coolly responded as if to say, “so I’m a Christian, what’s the big deal about that”?   I wasn’t used to such a mentality.  My friends and I were normally overjoyed when we discovered a new brother in Christ.  It was this mentality that created the desire for us to gather together over the next eighteen years.  At times I felt we were like Old Testament Israel , wandering from meeting-place to meeting-place, but we might have been more like the first generation Christians than Old Testament Jews.    

 

So do I believe the New Testament teaches us to meet in homes?  Not at all.   Home groups can be just as traditional as church building groups.  I’ve seen Sunday meetings in homes that look no different than those in a church building.  They had a home-made pulpit, chairs arranged in rows, an offering plate that was passed around after a couple of songs, a sermon, and a closing prayer.   Clearly, the room in which people meet is not the issue. 

 

The New Testament does not teach us where to meet.  Neither does it teach us when to meet, or how often to meet.  It does teach what to do when we meet.  1 Corinthians 14 teaches that a gathering of the saints is all about each saint contributing to the gathering, so we shouldn’t get too carried away with our meeting place, but we do.

 

That being said, church buildings that might have once been an expression of faith and worship have become an expression of the influence that secular culture has on us. In my opinion much of the thinking concerning church buildings today is similar to that of  the “paganization of Christianity” that took place in the fourth century.  Church buildings back then were built  to look like pagan buildings of worship.  Christians copied paganism in this respect in order to make the non-Christian feel comfortable in church buildings. The truth of the matter is that we are not to accommodate the sinner, but lead him to a place of repentance and faith so he can accommodate himself to Jesus.  Our tendency over the years has been to make the gospel  more palatable so that more people will fill our pews.   

 

Besides this, church buildings have become increasingly more expensive to build and to maintain.  Way too much effort is directed towards raising funds to meet the needs of the building, which takes away from our primary mission.  I know of church groups today that are feeling the economic pinch because of world economic problems and because of the transient nature of “church attenders” these days.  So the attempt to maintain the building, along with other budgetary needs becomes all-consuming. 

 

I’m reminded of the Laodicean church of Revelation 3:14 to 22. This church became rich by acquiring and accumulating a vast amount of possessions.  They needed nothing.  They were self-sufficient.  This is the meaning of Revelation 3:17.  In my thinking, this is the state of much of the western church of today.  Jesus was not impressed with this church.  He thought the church was pitifully shameful, and was ready to spit them out of His mouth.  That doesn’t sound very nice, but that’s called judgment, and that might just be our fate if we don’t repent of our excessiveness.                                                              

 

The New Testament neither promotes church buildings or house churches.  It promotes the church as being a living Body of believers, a counter-cultural community of Christ.  This church focuses on relationships between members of the Body and the work they are to perform, both within meetings and outside of meetings.  That should be our focus. 

 

 

 

Home Page

last section

next section