About Jesus    Steve Sweetman

Home Page

The Politics of God And The Bible

Part 12

Paul And Submission To Civil Authority

 

What Paul wrote in Romans 13:1 to 7 has been taken seriously by many Christians who have lived under, or, who presently live under, a dictatorial regime.  For those of us in the western world, Paul's remarks haven't been taken so seriously.  That will have to change. 

 

In Romans 13:1 Paul told his readers "to submit to the governing authorities", which I believe refers to civil leaders.  In Paul's day these authorities were part of a harsh dictatorial regime.  Paul's instruction to submit would have been hard for you to understand if you were a Christian back then.  The authorities to whom you were to submit might turn around, slice your head off, parade your skull around the city square, and feed your body to wild dogs roaming the streets.  Submission to ungodly authority is thus the issue we need to address in this passage.   

 

Paul based his reason to submit to civil authorities on the fact that "there is no authority except that which God has established".  I know the debate over the word "established".  Did God simply establish the idea of government, or, are all civil authorities placed in power by His sovereign choice?  Because Paul was speaking in the present tense, I believe he understood the authorities in his day were put there by God.  Paul knew certain Old Testament passages like Deuteronomy 32:8, Genesis 10, and others that helped form his thinking.  Deuteronomy 32:8 tells us that God gave the nations their inheritance and set their boundaries.  I believe Paul would tell you and I that the leaders of our nations, for one reason or another, have been set in place by God.  By no means does this suggest these leaders are godly people.       

 

Because God has established civil authorities, in verse 2 Paul says that if you rebel against these authorities, you rebel against that which God has established.  Such rebellion will bring judgment on you by these governing authorities.  In verse 3 he says, "the rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong".  Simply put, if you do good, you won't have to fear punishment by the authorities.  On the other hand, if you do wrong, you will fear the authorities.   

 

Paul says that if you want to be free from fearing the authorities, obey them. That makes sense, but if you were a first century Christian, you might think twice about this and respond by saying, "okay Paul, I’ll obey Caesar, but I'm still afraid of the guy". 

 

The context of Paul's words concerning fearing authorities is based on the premise that God put those authorities in place to punish those who do wrong.  That's my paraphrase of verse 4.  For this reason, if you obey the authorities, you won't have to fear being punished for unruly behaviour.  It's important to note that the fear Paul speaks of here is in relation to being afraid of being punished for doing wrong.  This fear isn't in reference to being afraid of Caesar slicing your head off for being a Christian. That's another issue. Caesar might still ax your head off, even if you do obey.  Besides, Jesus told us not to fear men like Caesar.  Such men can only kill you and burn your naked body in the city square.  They can't kill your soul.  So in the long run, we must fear God who can burn both soul and body in hell's fire. (Matthew 10:28)     

 

In verse 4 Paul tells us that the governing rulers are "God's servants" to do you good, but if you do wrong, be afraid.  Believe it or not, Caesar was God's man to administer justice on His behalf.  A study of the Old Testament shows that God caused Rome to rise to power.  That should have made Christians feel good about Caesar, but I doubt if it did.  Caesar did administer justice, but it was his brand of justice, not God's brand of justice.  Caesar viewed justice and matters of right and wrong differently than God.  That created the problem for Christians back then, as it will for us as well. 

 

Who ultimately defines what is right and what is wrong?  It's not Caesar.  It's God.  How we then submit to authorities who refuse to submit to God's authority is the issue at hand.

 

Verse 5 gives us two reasons why we are to submit to civil authorities, as bad as they might be.  The first reason is so we won't be punished for doing wrong.  The second reason is probably more important.  We submit  for the sake of our conscience.  Having a clean and undisturbed conscience is vital in our relationship to the state, as it is in all we do.  Concerning our conscience, it must be reformatted by God's Word because the human conscience is sinful and can't always be trusted.  A Biblical based conscience is fundamental to how and when we submit to the state.   

 

To sum up, Paul told us that civil authorities have been established by God to represent Him by enforcing matters of civil justice as defined by Him.  We therefore submit to the authorities, even if they are ungodly, in matters pertaining to justice as defined by God. 

 

Since civil authorities have been established by God, they are subject to Him.  If the authorities require us to submit in matters that clearly oppose God, the one they represent and to whom they must submit, we have no choice but to not submit.  Our consciences must be clean and undisturbed in this matter, as Paul's conscience was in Acts 24:17.      

 

Paul knew the authorities of this world were heavily influenced by demons.  He said so in Ephesians 6.  Paul himself didn't submit to civil authority in every situation, and he certainly wasn't afraid to stand up to rulers when an injustice was done.  In Acts 16:35 to 37 he withstood unjust authorities.  He and Silas were illegally beaten and imprisoned without a trial.  The authorities wanted to sweep this injustice under the carpet.  They commanded Paul and Silas to secretly leave town so no one would know of the injustice.  In a bold act of defiance, Paul refused to obey.  He didn't immediately leave town as ordered.  He and Silas visited the saints at Lydia 's home first.  He eventually did leave town, but at a time of his own choosing.  

 

Paul spent a large portion of his ministry standing up to  unjust authorities, and along the way he preached the gospel to them.  Jewish authorities had falsely accused Paul, landing him into a Roman prison.  He was offered freedom by the Roman authorities if he would drop the matter and not pursue justice.  You can call Paul stubborn, or you can call him a man of justice.  Whatever the case, he refused to drop the matter without a legal hearing.  He appealed to Caesar to defend himself and fight this injustice. (Acts 25:11)  Paul was respectful to governing authorities, and he did his best to submit, but when it came to matters of injustice as defined by God, he stood firm before the civil authorities.  In fact Paul became God's spokesman to these authorities in these matters.  

   

We submit to ungodly authorities, but when they demand submission in matters that clearly depart from Biblical truth, we peacefully and respectfully decline to obey, and accept the consequences.  Like the apostle Peter, we obey God rather than man. (Acts 4:19 – 20)  This issue is fast becoming an issue that Christians will have to address, even for those of us who live in the west.  More and more our civil authorities want us to join them in their ungodliness.  We just can't do that.   

 

We can't read Romans 13:1 to 7 and formulate our thinking on that passage alone.  We must understand this passage in the context of Paul's life, his ministry, and the rest of his teaching.  That's good hermeneutics.

Next Page

Previous Page

Home Page