About Jesus    Steve Sweetman

Home Page

The Politics of God And The Bible

Part 9

The Politics Of Jesus

 

I've just made a distinction between Yahweh's ecclesia and Jesus' ecclesia.  Jesus' ecclesia differs from Yahweh's ecclesia on many fronts.  For example, the Law of Moses was given to Israel to obey.  Jesus was given to Christians to obey.  In fact, Jesus put an end to the Law of Moses for the purpose of salvation and righteousness according to Romans 10:4.  The implications to this are vital for Christians, but few understand what these implications are.    

 

The Law of Moses told Israel, "don't kill".  Jesus tells Christians, "don't get angry without good cause".  The Law of Moses told Israel, "don't commit adultery".  Jesus tells Christians, "don't lust".  Whereas the Law of Moses spoke more or less to outward issues of man, Jesus speaks to the inward issues of man which will in turn take care of the outward issues.    

 

In Deuteronomy 13 God told Israel to kill false prophets and those who worship other gods.  Jesus and the New Testament tells Christians that vengeance and punishment belongs to God alone. (Romans 12:19)   

 

Christians are to live as Jesus lived while He was on earth.  We don't kill the false prophet or those who worship other gods.  We proclaim God's grace as seen in the forgiveness of sins once the sinner repents and hands His life over to Jesus.  As Jesus stated in His inaugural address, we proclaim "the day of God's favour".  

 

Yahweh told Israel to fight her way into the promised land.  They were to kill everyone, including women and children.  Christians are not to kill anyone in the advancement of the Kingdom of God.  We are to be people of peace as Jesus was when He was on earth, but again, not at the expense of truth.  If need be, like Jesus, we die by the sword in the advancement of His Kingdom.   

 

The Jews handed Jesus over to Pilate.  We know how Jesus felt about Roman officials.  In Matthew 20:25 and 26 Jesus said that Gentile rulers "lord it over" their subject, but that was not to be the case in the Kingdom of God.  Leaders in the Kingdom of God were to be servants, something I wish we'd better understand today.  Paul understood what this meant.  


In 2 Corinthians 1:24 he said, "not that we lord it over your faith, but we work with you for your joy".  In the mind of Jesus, there is a major distinction between the way national leaders lead and the way those in the Kingdom of God should lead.           

 

When Jesus stood before Pilate He rebuked Pilate for thinking he had authority over Him.  In John 19:11 Jesus told Pilate that he had no authority other than what His Father authorized.  Was Jesus thinking specifically of Pilate when He said this, or was He thinking of political leaders in general?  Jesus was talking specifically to Pilate, so good hermeneutics tells us that Jesus only had Pilate in mind when He spoke these words.  That being said, I believe there's sufficient Biblical evidence to say that what Jesus told Pilate also applies to other political leaders, including the one you voted for.        

 

Jesus also told Pilate that His kingdom was not of this world. If it were, His servants would fight to prevent His arrest. (John 18:36)  Christians don't belong to the nations in which they live.  We're citizens of the heavenly kingdom.  For this reason we are passivists when it comes to the advancement of the Kingdom of God.  We do not use physical force as a means of evangelization.  The so-called "holy wars" of the 11th and 12th centuries were not holy.  The Crusades throughout the middle east were in direct opposition to what Jesus told Pilate.  The same is true concerning certain Reformation leaders who used force to subdue their opposition.  Such violence is a disgrace and a blemish on our Christian heritage.  It haunts us to this very day.  Talk to any educated Muslim and he will point out those sins.  

 

I must comment on Matthew 11:12.  The KJV reads, "from the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent take it by force".  The NIV reads, "from the days of John the Baptist to now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it".  If you read these two versions carefully, I think you will agree with me that they say different things. 

 

To me the KJV suggests that violent men use force against the Kingdom of God, which was seen in the beheading of John the Baptist and the killing of Jesus.  The RSV Interlinear Greek/English New Testament seems to agree when it translates the expanded form of the Greek word "biazo" as "is forcefully treated", as in, "the Kingdom of God is being forcefully treated by forceful men".  Simply put, it's violent men who are doing violence to the Kingdom of God.     

 

The NIV seems to suggest the opposite when it says "the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it".  Christians are the ones who are violent in the NIV, not the persecutors of Christians.  Again, this is how the Roman soldiers would have understood this passage when they spread terror in the name of Christ throughout the middle east in the crusades of the 11th and 12th centuries. 

 

I've heard this passage misused countless times over the years.  People see the words "violence" and "forceful" and believe the gospel of Jesus must advance with military like force and fervor.  Some people have been physically violent while others have been violent in their attitude.  Whatever the case, I believe such violent actions and thoughts go against everything Jesus taught and the way He lived while He was on earth.  We are not to be militant extremists, either in deed or in attitude.  We are to be humble servants, speaking the truth in love, even if it kills us, as it killed Jesus and countless others throughout the centuries. 

 

In Matthew 11:12 Jesus was saying that the Kingdom of God was suffering violence by violent men, and the violence was still taking place as He spoke.  The difference between various versions of Matthew 11:12 is a matter of translating one language into another.  It's difficult at times not to impose your theological positions into the translation process.  How you translate this verse will determine how you interpret it, and in turn determine how you advance the gospel of the Kingdom of God. 

 

We certainly need to be single-minded and dedicated in the advancement of the Kingdome of God, as some understand Matthew 11:12 to mean.   That being said, being militant and violent is nowhere to be found in the politics of Jesus and the Bible.     

 

Next Page

Previous Page

Home Page