|
About Jesus Steve Sweetman Romans 3 ch. 3:1-8 ch. 3:9-20 ch. 3:21-31 In
the previous verses Paul was pretty hard on the Jews.
He did not spare any words by telling them that they weren’t any
better than the Gentile sinner. So in chapter 3 verse 1 he asks a very
natural question that someone might ask him after his discourse about the
Jewish people. He asks,
“what advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there
in circumcision?” After what
Paul has just said you might think the answer to this question is,
“none“, that is, there is
no advantage at all. Paul does
not answer this way, but says verse in 2 that there is an advantage and it
is “much in every way”. In
verse 2 Paul begins to list the reasons why Jews have an advantage.
“First of all…”, he says, “they have been entrusted with
the very words of God”. Paul says “first of all” as if he was going
to give a list of a number of points, yet he must have been sidetracked
because he never did finish his list. Being
“entrusted with the very words of God”, would be a great advantage
over the Gentiles. It would be
like getting a head start in a marathon.
Having God’s will laid out for you would surely help you in the
development of being God’s people. You
might ask, "what are the words of God"?
Well, they are every word that God spoke in Old Testament times.
God spoke to many individuals, and He spoke
to prophets that passed God's words on to Israel.
Examples of this would be the personal things God talked to Adam
about, to Abraham about, and to many others about.
God spoke to Abraham and promised him, his descendents, and his
offspring certain things. God
spoke through the prophets to Israel, words of encouragement, instruction,
rebuke, and judgment. Israel had all these words at their disposal.
In
these, “the very words of God”, were promises of salvation as well as
Israel's future. Paul
anticipates an argument, so he asks the question in verse 3, “what if
some did not have faith? Will
their lack of faith nullify God’s faithfulness?”
Paul clearly and simply answers in verse 4, “not at all”.
Just because Israel did not believe the “words of God” that
they were entrusted with does not change the way God would act in His
faithfulness. We
know that God would not change His mind
concerning these things because the Abrahamic Covenant that is
spelled out and confirmed many times in the Old Testament was a covenant
that God made with Himself. God
said that He would do certain things with and for Israel.
He did not enter into covenant with Israel.
He entered into covenant with Himself.
He promised Himself to bless Israel, and that is what He will do in
the end. This will be seen at
the end of this age. This
verse is important for those who believe that the Jews have no more
significance in the eyes of God, and that the church is the only people of
God these days. Paul
clearly says that Israel’s unbelief did not nullify God’s promises to
them. Therefore, whatever God
promised to Israel in Old Testament times, He will fulfill.
God promised Israel complete restoration, and that He will do at
the end of this age. Genesis
15 gives us an understanding to why Israel's unfaithfulness doesn’t
discount God's faithfulness. Genesis
15 recalls the covenant ceremony concerning the Abrahamic Covenant.
If you read the chapter closely, you will see that Abraham was
asleep when the covenant was ratified. God did not make a covenant with
Abraham. He made it with
Himself. God covenanted with
Himself to do certain things, and the fulfillment of these things did not
depend on Israel, but God alone. This
is seen in the fact that Abraham did not participate in the confirmation
ceremony.
This
is what it means when Paul says in verse 4, "let God be true and
every man a liar." God
promised Israel certain things. God
cannot lie. He will do as He
says. In comparison to God,
every man is a liar.
In
verse 5 Paul is implying in his answer that our unfaithfulness is actually
showing forth God’s faithfulness even more.
If this were the case then one might think, “that God is unjust
in bringing His wrath on us”. This
too is a natural question that Paul anticipates people asking.
If God’s faithfulness and love towards man is more clearly seen
and demonstrated because of our sinfulness, why should He then judge and
condemn us? Why doesn’t God
just let us sin so He can be even more loving by having mercy on us while
we sin? In
verse 5 Paul quotes from Psalm 51:4. The
Psalmist speaks about being proved when God speaks and judges. What God
says will come about. How He
judges is proved to be just. God
cannot lie. He cannot speak
falsehoods. He cannot judge unjustly.
What
Paul asks in verse 5 he specifically says is a human argument, and that it
is. Anyone who understands
Scripture knows the point Paul is making is purely humanistic, but he
makes it because he anticipates someone asking it.
This is how Paul writes in the book of Romans.
It is a defense of the gospel.
He makes a point. He
asks the questions that people would ask, and he answers the question.
The
point that Paul raises in verse 5 is this.
If our unrighteousness brings out God's righteousness more clearly,
why does he judge us for being unrighteous.
In fact God should be happy with out sin, because our sin makes His
sinlessness even more visible to everyone.
That is logical, but it is humanistic.
In
verse 6 Paul counters that argument by
saying" certainly not. Paul
says that there is no logic in that point.
If that were so, how could God judge the world, he says.
The point about God judging the world is understood by both sides.
Paul believes his opposition believes that God will judge the
world, and He will because man is unrighteous and sinful.
So if God will judge the world, then even though our
unrighteousness shows God's righteousness more clearly, it still needs to
be accounted for at the day of judgment.
In
verse 7 Paul continues this train of thought. He gives an example of
unrighteousness. He states
that if his untruthfulness enhances the truth of God and shows God's
glory, why does God still call him a sinner?
This is a question that Paul's opposition will ask. It is logical
from a humanistic standpoint.
Paul
says in verse 8 that he has been slandered by some when they say that he
is teaching people that they can “do evil that good may result”.
You will see this come up again later in Romans.
When Paul gets into his argument that salvation is by faith alone,
some got the idea that he was saying that the more we sin, the more we do
wrong, the more God can have mercy on us, so let’s go ahead and sin,
because we know God will give us grace anyway.
Paul was not saying any such thing, but sad to say, some were
saying that of Paul, and some Christians even today live as though Paul
was saying just that. Paul
says that those who believe this, live this, and say that he teaches this
should be condemned. Many
Christians today live a very sloppy life.
They sin, thinking that God will forgive every sin.
But, they fail to understand that true repentance plays a very
important part in the forgiveness process.
There is no forgiveness without true repentance, so if you expect
to sin, thinking God will forgive you anyway, you better think again.
No
One Is Righteous
(ch. 3:9-20) These
verses, from Rom. 3:9 to verse 20 are transitional verses. Paul gives a
quick conclusion with some Scripture to back up his point and then ends
this section with the next topic he will be addressing. In
verse 9 Paul asks, "what shall we conclude?"
Another question that he asks is, "are we any better?"
The word "we" refers to the Jews.
The question is meant to sum up what he has explained so far.
The only logical conclusion is that “Jews and Gentiles alike are
all under sin”. This means
that God has “given us all over to sin” and the resulting judgment of
God‘s wrath and anger. In
verse 10 He begins to quote
from Psa. 14:1 – 3 and 53: 1
- 3, “there is none righteous, no not one”.
That doesn’t sound like our “I’m Okay, You’re Okay”
mentality. That was a popular
book back in the early 1970's that basically said "we're all okay.
Let's hot worry about ourselves."
The
idea that Jews are in the same boat when it comes to sin would not sit
well with the Jewish leaders. This
is one reason why Paul experienced the same trouble from the Jews that
Jesus had experienced. He is telling the truth about them and they don't
like it. Without
commenting on each quote Paul uses, he does say in verse 12 that, “all
have become … worthless”. Remember
our definition of the word “depraved”.
Depraved means worthless. We
see here again the historic doctrine of the “Depravity Of Man”.
If you really want to understand how God feels about mankind, read
verses 10 through 18. It
paints a very bad picture of us, something modern man refuses to believe
about himself. The final thing
that is said about man in the list of depravity here, is that we "do
not fear God". Not
fearing God is our basic and underlying problem that makes us what we are,
sinful and depraved. Paul
ends these quotes with Psa. 31:1, “there is no fear of God before their
eyes”. This may be one of
the fundamental sins of man. We
have no fear of God. Whether
you interpret fear as “reverence for God, or just “simply being afraid
and scared”, both have been lost from the minds of man.
We no longer reverence God. We
are no longer scared of who He is and what He can do. The awesomeness of
God has been replaced in our thinking with some vague concept of a God who
might be out there someplace, and loves us despite anything we might do.
In
verse 19 Paul says "we know that whatever the law says, it says for
those who are under the law." There
is some debate over what law Paul is really speaking of.
Is it the Law of Moses, and if so, why doesn't the NIV and other
translations capitalize the word "law".
So, some people believe it is the Law of Moses Paul is speaking of.
On the other hand, some people say it is "law" in
general, that is any law. Whatever
the case, I believe what Paul is speaking about concerning law would apply
to both. One
result of what Paul is speaking about here is that the Law of Moses
doesn't apply to Gentile Christians. It was meant for Jews.
This is important because the major problem in the early church was
over Christian Gentiles having to obey the Law.
What Paul says here should tell us that the Law of Moses wasn't
written for Gentiles, so when they become Christians it does not apply to
them. Even
if what Paul is speaking of here is "law in general, that would be
fine. It does not take away
from his point, which is that law can make no one righteous, as he says in
verse 20. This would apply to
the Law of Moses, and if it applies to God's Law, it surely would apply to
any man made law. But, humans
always have a tendency to add their own laws to God's gospel, which in my
opinion is blasphemy. One
thing to note about how we should view the word "law" here.
In the particular Greek New Testament that I have, the word
"the" does not appear in the text.
So, it's not "the law", as the NIV puts it.
It's merely "law". That would support the idea that Paul
is speaking about law in general terms.
I
personally believe what Paul is talking about here is "law" in
general terms. One reason is
what I've just said. The word
"the" does not appear in front of the word "law" in
the Greek text. Along with
this, you will note in verse 21 we see in the NIV that in the same verse
the word "law" is used twice. Once it is not capitalized and
once it is. The verse reads,
"now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known,
to which the Law and Prophets testify."
The reason why the first law is not capitalized is because the word
"the" does not appear in the Greek text.
The reason why the second "Law" is capitalized is because
the word "the" does appear before the word "Law" in
the Greek text, suggesting it is a particular Law that Paul had in mind.
When Paul adds the words "and Prophets" to the word
"Law", we know that it is the Law of Moses he had in mind.
Verse
20 presents a great truth in the good news of Christ.
Paul gives one reason for the existence of the Law.
The reason is to silence every mouth and to make the whole world
accountable. “Therefore”,
as Paul puts it, “no one will be declared righteous … by observing the
Law, rather through the Law we become conscious of sin”. We should note
here, that the “whole world” is now accountable to God.
No one is left out, whether you have the Law of Moses or not. Note
the word "declared". God
"declares" us righteous. That
doesn't mean we are righteous. He
only views us as righteous. Righteous
simply means living right according to God's standards, even as God
Himself lives. God thus will
view us as living right if we accept what Paul is about to say.
No
law in the world, whether it is God’s Law or a man made law can make us
righteous in God’s eyes. If
God’s Law can’t do it, lets not think that any of our ecclesiastical
laws can do it either. Sad to
say, but we always tend to settle into a salvation by law, and usually the
law is our own that we have made up. We
always have to feel that we need to do something, or obey something to be
made right before God. This is
not the case and this is how Paul introduces his next topic, which is,
“righteousness by faith”.
Righteousness
Through Faith (ch. 3:21 – 31)
This
is my definition of the word righteous.
Righteousness is being perfectly right all the time in the essence
of who one is. The very nature
of God is that He is totally right in who He is all the time. Therefore if
someone is righteous, then who he is righteous, and what he does is
righteous. The point to my
definition is that that righteousness is a state of being, not simply
about things we do or don't do. Paul
has stated in earlier chapters that no man has ever been righteous.
Paul
has stated that we are all worthless, all unrighteous.
He has also stated that the only way one can be righteous is to
obey God’s Law all of the time, in every small detail, which we can't do
and never will be able to do. We
thus have a problem. God
demands righteousness from us, because that is His nature.
He is perfect and right in every aspect of who He is.
He cannot expect anything else from His creation.
The problem that faced God and man was, how to get man to be
righteous? God
instituted the Law of Moses to Israel so she would know how to be
righteous, but the Law could not make Israel righteous. It only pointed
out more of their sin. Here
in chapter 3 verse 21 we begin to see God’s answer to this problem.
Paul says, “but now a righteousness apart from law has been made
known”. This would be a
shocking statement to the Jews since they knew that righteousness came by
obeying the Law of Moses. Paul
is now telling the Jews, and everyone else that there is a way to become
righteous, and it has nothing to do with law.
A matter of fact both the Law of Moses and Prophets have testified
to this righteousness. Paul is
saying that the Law and the Prophets foretold this way of being righteous,
something the Jewish leaders did not see in the Law and Prophets.
We
need to note in verse 21 that Paul uses two terms.
He uses the word "law", and the word "Law".
When he says that there is a righteousness apart from law, that's
any law. The word
"law" is not capitalized and there is no direct article in front
of it. That is to say,
"law' means any law. "The
law" would mean a specific law. He
does use the term "The Law" when he says that it testifies of
this righteousness. This is my
point. Because Paul is not
using the definite article "the", and because our English Bible
does not capitalize "law", he is not talking about the Law of
Moses. He is talking about law
in general. He's simply saying
that there is absolutely no law that can make us righteous before God.
For further discussion on the difference between "law"
and "Law" see my notes in the previous section.
This
new righteousness comes by “having faith in Jesus Christ”, or
“trusting Jesus Christ”. Having
this faith means we trust that Jesus did what was necessary in order to
give righteousness to us, or,
to declare us as being righteous, even though we aren't.
In
verse 22 Paul says that this righteousness is “for all”.
Why is it for all? Because
“all have sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God”.
If all have sinned, then all are eligible to believe.
In
verse 22 we have the introduction of the word "faith'.
"Faith" needs to be properly understood.
If it isn't, we will not understand what Paul is saying.
We will misrepresent him completely.
Faith simply means trust. The
word "faith" is misused in our generation.
We speak of the Baptist faith, the Catholic faith and so on.
Faith in that sense of the word is not faith.
We should not use faith that way.
When Paul speaks about having faith in Jesus, or believing in
Jesus, He means that we must trust Him, trust Him with our very lives,
which includes our salvation, our declared righteousness.
In
the last part of verse 22 and in verse 23 Paul says that anyone can put
their trust in Jesus. He is
saying that this trust isn't just for Jews, but for Gentiles too.
He says this because what he has just said, and can be seen in
verse 23. Since he has just
proved all are sinners, it is then only logical that all can put their
trust in Jesus in order to be declared righteous.
In
verse 24 Paul says that, “all … are justified freely through the
redemption that is found in Christ Jesus”.
This is a great verse. Our
salvation is “free” because of God’s grace towards us.
It is free, we do not have to pay for it.
We do not have to earn it by obeying laws and doing good.
It is totally free. We
who are worthless and depraved can find salvation free of charge.
Salvation might be free, but it's not cheap.
Jesus paid a very great price for this salvation.
It is so expensive that only He has the ability to pay for it.
We
have three new and important words that appear in these verses that we
have not seen before. They are “justify”,
“redemption” and “atonement“. What do these words mean? Justification,
or to justify is from the Greek word “dikoisis”.
You might notice both
“righteousness”, and “justify” are from the same Greek root word.
To justify a person is “to declare or pronounce that person
righteous, or right and just”. This
means that God the Judge has acquitted or released us from our sin and due
punishment, and has declared or pronounced us who trust Jesus, as being
righteous. Justification
is the “actual legal pronouncement by God”.
I say legal, because God had contracted, or agreed, or covenanted
with Himself to do this for us. A
covenant is often a legal contract. Paul
says that this justification is “free” to us, but it wasn’t free for
God. There was a price
paid. Jesus paid the price on
the cross. Jesus. in His
perfect life did the necessary work so we would not have to work for our
justification. This very
expensive gift has come free to us only because Jesus was the one who paid
for it. The
next new word we want to look at is the word “redemption”.
The Greek word used for “redeem” or “redemption” is
“exagorozo”, which means “to buy out”.
There is another Greek word used for “redeem” and it is the
word “lutroo”. This is the
word that is used here in Romans 3:24.
“Lutroo” is defined as “a release once a ransom is paid”.
There
is a slight difference between “exagorazo” and “lutroo”.
“Exagorazo” puts the emphasis on the price that has been paid,
while “lutroo” stresses the actual releasing once the price has been
paid. Redemption
therefore is the purchasing of someone’s freedom.
The word is often used when someone buys out a slave’s freedom.
This is exactly what Jesus did for us.
He purchased, or bought out our freedom from sin and its penalty.
The price that He paid was His own blood.
The Scripture say that He “purchased our freedom with His
blood”. We need to understand that Jesus purchased this freedom from
God, not the devil as some think.
As Paul says in 2 Cor. 5:21, “God made Him (Jesus) who had no sin
to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of
God”.
The
third new word that appears here in chapter 3 is the word “atonement”.
The Greek word “hilaskomai” is the Greek word that is
translated as “atonement” here in chapter 3 verse 25.
Not all translations translate “hilaskomai” as atonement in
this verse, We won’t get
into that now. The Greek word
“katallasso” is the word that is translated as “atonement” the
most in the New Testament. This
word means “to change”. “Katallasso”
was the word often used in the exchange of money in Paul’s day.
Today we might say, “can you change a ten dollar bill into two
five dollar bills”? “Katallasso”
in the Biblical sense means that God “has changed us from being His
enemy to being His friend”. “Katalasso”
is often translated “reconcile”. So
when we hear the word “atonement”, we need to understand that it means
“becoming friends with God”, because of Jesus’ shed blood on the
cross has taken away our enemy status.
Verse
25 says, “God presented Him (Jesus) as an atoning sacrifice…”
As I mentioned above the Greek word for “atoning” that is used
here is not the one usually translated as atonement.
The specific thought here is that God made Jesus to be a sacrifice
that “turned away God’s anger from us”.
Why was His anger turned away from us?
Because God’s anger was poured out on Jesus on the cross.
Therefore God no longer had to be angry with us. This
is my paraphrase of Rom. 3:23 to 25. “We
all have sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God.
God has freely and without cost, declared us totally right and
just, even as He Himself is totally right and just in who He is, by His
grace when He purchased
us for Himself by Jesus
Christ‘s death. God turned
away His wrath and anger from us so we would be no longer enemies but
friends, through trusting in the blood of Jesus”.
Paul
says in verse 25 and 26 that God did all of this for us to demonstrate His
justice. What does this mean?
Paul continues to say that sins committed in the past did not get
punished. Because God is just
He cannot go forever without punishing someone for all of the sinful acts
committed in times past. So to
satisfy His sense of justice, God punished Jesus for all of our
sinfulness. This satisfied
God’s justice and showed His mercy towards
us at the same time. God
could now feel good because someone was punished for sin, even though it
was Jesus who was punished. In
one moment of time God both loved us and satisfied His justness.
What great love He has
for us. In
verse 27 Paul says that because of this demonstration of love there is no
way we can boast. We did not
do anything to receive this mercy to boast about.
Jesus did it all. We
cannot boast about obeying any law that has made us right and just before
God. It was all done by Jesus.
Verse 28 is another one of those key verses.
It says, “ we
maintain that a man is justified by
faith apart from the Law”. Let
me say, if God says that His own law justifies no one, then any law that
we make up certainly is meaningless when it comes to our salvation.
To think any differently would be telling Jesus what He did on the
cross was not good enough, and that we need to add a couple more things.
What a horrible thought.
Sad to say, we have done this many times throughout history. Paul
concludes this section by reiterating the fact that there is no difference
between the Jews and Gentiles when it comes to being declared righteous.
We all come to God through the “same faith”, through trusting Jesus
alone for our salvation.
We
need to note something very important here. Your understanding of what I
am about to say will determine how you view end time prophecy.
Paul says that there is no difference between Jew and Gentile here.
We need to understand that there is no difference between Jew and
Gentile when it comes to salvation. We've
all sinned, and we all can be saved. Paul
is only talking about salvation. There
remains a difference between Jew and Gentile when it comes to what I call
"prophetic history". Without going into great detail, through
that Abrahamic Covenant found in Genesis 12:1 to 3
and elsewhere, God promised Israel certain things that would last
forever. He promised that
they'd be a great nation and that they'd have a particular portion of
land, among other things. Some
of these promises have not yet been fulfilled.
God will fulfill them. Israel
will always be a distinct and special nation in God's sight forever.
There are so many passages that point this out.
Paul also speaks to this later on, in chapter 9 through 11.
He has to clarify the Jewish place in prophetic history in this
book of Romans because of what he has just said about there being no
difference between Jew and Gentile in this passage. In
verse 31 Paul makes it clear that he is not nullifying the Law of Moses by
what he just said. He says
that he still "upholds" the Law. That is to say,
Paul still believes there is a place for the Law of Moses.
It's just not the same place that it once had.
He will explain later.
|